Vietscholar forum
Chia sẻ tài nguyên where (desperate) buyers meet (voluntary) suppliers and service providers with...zero cost. Market clearance, hopefully.
01-19-2011
#1 (permalink )
Chuyên gia một dòng
Tham gia ngày: May 2010
Đến từ: Stony Brook
Bài gởi: 654
Thanks: 76
Thanked 129 Times in 104 Posts
Downloads: 3
Uploads: 0
Chia sẻ paper hay! Hình như hồi trước HC mở topic này rồi nhưng mà chả biết để đâu, chắc là khi forum được xây dựng lại thì một số bài viết bị mất. Vì vậy tớ lập lại topic này để mọi người chia sẻ những paper mà mình thấy hay mà có thể nhũng người khác ngành có hứng thú đọc. Những paper post ở đây có thể là những review mà không quá chuyên sâu.
Có thể post theo form sau
Trích:
Link - Ngành
Abstract
(có thể thêm pdf file và các thông tin khác cho những ai không thể lấy được paper. Bạn nào có nhu cầu đọc paper đó thì có thể yêu cầu tác giả upload lên )
Ví dụ
Article:
[Comp.Bio] Can we trust docking results? Evaluation of seven commonly used programs on PDBbind database [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] Abstract
Docking is one of the most commonly used techniques in drug design. It is used for both identifying correct poses of a ligand in the binding site of a protein as well as for the estimation of the strength of protein–ligand interaction. Because millions of compounds must be screened, before a suitable target for biological testing can be identified, all calculations should be done in a reasonable time frame. Thus, all programs currently in use exploit empirically based algorithms, avoiding systematic search of the conformational space. Similarly, the scoring is done using simple equations, which makes it possible to speed up the entire process. Therefore, docking results have to be verified by subsequent in vitro studies. The purpose of our work was to evaluate seven popular docking programs (Surflex, LigandFit, Glide, GOLD, FlexX, eHiTS, and AutoDock) on the extensive dataset composed of 1300 protein–ligands complexes from PDBbind 2007 database, where experimentally measured binding affinity values were also available. We compared independently the ability of proper posing [according to Root mean square deviation (or Root mean square distance) of predicted conformations versus the corresponding native one] and scoring (by calculating the correlation between docking score and ligand binding strength). To our knowledge, it is the first large-scale docking evaluation that covers both aspects of docking programs, that is, predicting ligand conformation and calculating the strength of its binding. More than 1000 protein–ligand pairs cover a wide range of different protein families and inhibitor classes. Our results clearly showed that the ligand binding conformation could be identified in most cases by using the existing software, yet we still observed the lack of universal scoring function for all types of molecules and protein families. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Comput Chem, 2011
___________________________________________________________
Bò không ăn cỏ bò ngu
Trai không gái gú trai ngu hơn bò.
Lần đọc: 411
02-10-2011
Chuyên gia một dòng
Tham gia ngày: May 2010
Đến từ: Stony Brook
Bài gởi: 654
Thanks: 76
Thanked 129 Times in 104 Posts
Downloads: 3
Uploads: 0
Ðề: Chia sẻ paper hay! Novel paradigms for drug discovery: computational multitarget screening.
Jenwitheesuk E, Horst JA, Rivas KL, Van Voorhis WC, Samudrala R.
Department of Microbiology, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Box 357242, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Article:
An established paradigm in current drug development is (i) to identify a single protein target whose inhibition is likely to result in the successful treatment of a disease of interest; (ii) to assay experimentally large libraries of small-molecule compounds in vitro and in vivo to identify promising inhibitors in model systems; and (iii) to determine whether the findings are extensible to humans. This complex process, which is largely based on trial and error, is risk-, time- and cost-intensive. Computational (virtual) screening of drug-like compounds simultaneously against the atomic structures of multiple protein targets, taking into account protein-inhibitor dynamics, might help to identify lead inhibitors more efficiently, particularly for complex drug-resistant diseases. Here we discuss the potential benefits of this approach, using HIV-1 and Plasmodium falciparum infections as examples. We propose a virtual drug discovery 'pipeline' that will not only identify lead inhibitors efficiently, but also help minimize side-effects and toxicity, thereby increasing the likelihood of successful therapies.
[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
__________________
Bò không ăn cỏ bò ngu
Trai không gái gú trai ngu hơn bò.
Latex Maths & Physics Editor ...
Ðang đọc: 1 (0 thành viên và 1 khách)
Ðiều Chỉnh Kiếm Trong Bài
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML đang Tắt